Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Michael C. Tierney v. Delanie Prescott-Tate

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAII


November 16, 2010

MICHAEL C. TIERNEY, PETITIONER,
v.
DELANIE PRESCOTT-TATE, DEPUTY PROSECUTING ATTORNEY, RESPONDENT.

Hawaii Supreme and/or Appellate Courts 30722ordada.doc

Electronically Filed Supreme Court 30722

16-NOV-2010 02:05 PM

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

ORDER

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, and Duffy, JJ. and Circuit Judge Crandall, assigned by reason of vacancy)

Upon consideration of petitioner Michael C. Tierney's petition for a writ of mandamus, it appears that petitioner fails to demonstrate a clear and indisputable right to relief. See Kema v. Gaddis, 91 Hawaii 200, 204, 982 P.2d 334, 338 (1999) (A writ of mandamus is an extraordinary remedy that will not issue unless the petitioner demonstrates a clear and indisputable right to relief and a lack of alternative means to redress adequately the alleged wrong or obtain the requested action.). Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the clerk of the appellate court shall process the petition for a writ of mandamus without payment of the filing fee.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for a writ of mandamus is denied.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, November 16, 2010.

Mark E. Recktenwald

Paula A. Nakayama

Simeon R. Acoba, Jr. James E. Duffy, Jr. Virginia L. Crandall

20101116

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.