Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Paul Peters v. Roberts Markel

October 31, 2012

PAUL PETERS, PLAINTIFF,
v.
ROBERTS MARKEL, PC; BENTWATER YACHT AND COUNTRY CLUB, LTD.; BRADY ORTEGA; AND DOES I THROUGH X, DEFENDANTS.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Susan Oki Mollway Chief United States District Judge

AMENDED ORDER SEVERING FDCPA CLAIM AND DIRECTING ENTRY OF FINAL JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF BENTWATER ON THAT CLAIM; AMENDED ORDER TRANSFERRING REMAINING CLAIMS TO THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS, HOUSTON DIVISION

I. INTRODUCTION.

On May 24, 2011, Paul Peters, a Utah attorney who now resides in Hawaii, filed this action against Bentwater Yacht and Country Club, Ltd., and its attorneys, Brady Ortego, Esq., and the law firm of Roberts Markel, PC. See ECF No. 1. The Complaint asserted claims under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act ("FDCPA"), Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations ("RICO") Act, and various state laws arising out of membership dues supposedly owed to Bentwater for separate properties purchased by Peters and his wife. Id.

By stipulation, the RICO claim was dismissed without prejudice. See ECF No. 26. The stipulation provided that, if this case were transferred, Peters could "reinstate and refile the RICO claim provided it complies with the Local Rules of the United States District Court and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure." Id. Defendants reserved the right to challenge the sufficiency of any such claim. Id.

Peters has recently settled and dismissed with prejudice all claims against Defendants Ortego and Roberts Markel. See Stipulation for Partial Dismissal of Complaint With Prejudice As Against Defendants Roberts Markel, PC and Brady Ortego and Order, ECF No. 191.

The present order includes matters that were included in motions argued before this court on May 8, 2012. Following that hearing, the court granted Bentwater summary judgment with respect to the FDCPA claims. See Amended Order Granting in Part, Denying in Part, and Continuing in Part Motions for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 131, June 13, 2012.

The only claims remaining in this case are state-law claims asserted against Bentwater for Theft (Second Claim for Relief); Wrongful Lien (Fourth Claim for Relief); and Breach of Contract (Fifth Claim for Relief).

Before the court are two matters. First, the court still has a portion of Bentwater's continuted motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim, failing to plead fraud with particularity, lack of personal jurisdiction, and improper venue.

Bentwater alternatively seeks to have this matter transferred to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Houston Division. See ECF No. 34.

Second, Peters moves for Rule 54(b) certification of this court's earlier order granting summary judgment to Bentwater on claims brought under the FDCPA. Peters also seeks a stay of any order transferring venue to allow him to appeal the grant of summary judgment in favor of Bentwater on his FDCPA claims. See ECF No. 184. Pursuant to Rule 21 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the court severs the FDCPA claims on which Bentwater has been granted summary judgment and directs the Clerk of Court to enter judgment in favor of Bentwater on those claims. The court transfers the rest of the case (i.e., the state-law claims against Bentwater) to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Houston Division.

II. BACKGROUND.

The facts of this case were set forth in this court's Amended Order Granting in Part, Denying in Part, and Continuing in Part Motions for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 131, June 13, 2012. Those facts are incorporated herein by reference and are supplemented as stated below.

III. ANALYSIS.

A. The Remainder of the Case is ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.