Vestal K. Simeona v. Neil Abercrombie

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-13-0000019 19-FEB-2013 08:43 AM

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, and McKenna, JJ., and Circuit Judge Ahn, in place of Pollack, J., recused)

Upon consideration of petitioner Vestal K. Simeona's petition for a writ of mandamus, which was filed on January 10, 2013, and the documents attached thereto and submitted in support thereof, it appears that petitioner fails to demonstrate that he has a clear and indisputable right to be released from custody. Moreover, petitioner may seek relief in the circuit court and by way of appeal, as appropriate. Petitioner, therefore, is not entitled to mandamus relief. See Kema v. Gaddis, 91 Hawaii 200, 204, 982 P.2d 334, 338 (1999) (a writ of mandamus is an extraordinary remedy that will not issue unless the petitioner demonstrates a clear and indisputable right to relief and a lack of alternative means to redress adequately the alleged wrong or obtain the requested action). Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for a writ of mandamus is denied.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr. /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Karen S.S. Ahn

20130219