ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (DC-SC 13-1-0061)
Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, McKenna, and Pollack, JJ.
ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS
Upon consideration of petitioner John Blumer-Buell's petition for a writ of mandamus, filed on November 6, 2013, the supporting documents, and the record, it appears that petitioner is attempting to take an appeal not provided by statute. See HRS 633-28(a) ("There shall be no appeal from a judgment of the small claims division[.]"). Moreover, petitioner fails to show any grounds entitling him to the extraordinary remedy of a writ of mandamus. See Kema v. Gaddis, 91 Hawai'i 200, 204, 982 P.2d 334, 338 (1999) (a writ of mandamus is an extraordinary remedy that will not issue unless the petitioner demonstrates a clear and indisputable right to relief and a lack of alternative means to redress adequately the alleged wrong or obtain the requested action); Honolulu Advertiser, Inc. v. Takao, 59 Haw. 237, 241, 580 P.2d 58, 62 (1978) (a writ of mandamus is not intended to supersede the legal discretionary authority of the trial courts, cure a mere legal error, or serve as a legal remedy in lieu of normal appellate procedure; rather, it is meant to restrain a judge of an inferior court from acting beyond or in excess of his or her jurisdiction); Ch ...