January 13, 2014
BONNIE L. MEDEIROS, Claimant-Appellee,
EAN HOLDINGS, LLC, Employer-Appellant, and FIDELITY AND GUARANTY INSURANCE/AVIZENT, Insurance Carrier/Third-Party Administrator-Appellant
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAII REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER
APPEAL FROM THE LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS APPEALS BOARD (AB 2010-375(M) (7-10-00485)).
Nakamura, C.J., Foley and Fujise, JJ.
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL FOR LACK OF APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Upon review of the record, it appears that this court lacks appellate jurisdiction over the appeal by Employer-Appellant Ean Holdings, LLC and Insurance Carrier-Third-Party Administrator-Appellant Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance/York Financial Services (formerly Avizent) (collectively Appellants).
Appellants appeal from a Decision and Order, filed on March 20, 2013, by the Labor and Industrial Relations Appeals Board (LIRAB).
Pursuant to HRS § 386-88 (Supp. 2012) and HRS § 91-14(a) (1993 & Supp. 2012),  an aggrieved party may appeal a final decision and order by the LIRAB directly to the Intermediate Court of Appeals.
The appeal of a decision or order of the LIRAB is governed by HRS § 91-14 (a), the statute authorizing appeals in administrative agency cases. HRS § 91-14 (a) authorizes judicial review of a final decision and order in a contested case or a preliminary ruling of the nature that deferral of review pending entry of a subsequent final decision would deprive appellant of adequate relief. For purposes of HRS § 91-14(a), we have defined "final order" to mean an order ending the proceedings, leaving nothing further to be accomplished.
Bocalbos v. Kapiolani Medical Center for Women and Children, 8 9 Hawai'i 436, 439, 974 P.2d 1026, 1029 (1999) (citation and some internal quotation marks omitted). The supreme court has "held that an order that finally adjudicates a benefit or penalty under the worker's compensation law is an appealable final order under HRS § 91-14(a), although other issues remain." Lindinha v. Hilo Coast Processing Co., 104 Hawai'i 164, 168, 86 P.3d 973, 977 (2004) (citation omitted) (emphasis added).
The March 20, 2013 Decision and Order is not a final appealable order because it only determined that Claimant suffered an injury arising out of and in the course of employment, and no determination of Claimant's benefits has been made. Mitchell v. State, 77 Hawai'i 307-08, 884 P.2d 368, 370-71 (1994) .
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed for lack of appellate jurisdiction.