ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (FC-D NO. 13-1-7625)
BY RECKTENWALD, C.J., NAKAYAMA, MCKENNA, POLLACK, AND WILSON, JJ.
ORDER GRANTING PETITION FOR WRIT OF PROHIBITION
We have considered Petitioner Joe Crofford's petition for a writ of prohibition, filed on February 25, 2014, the supplement to the petition, the response filed by Respondent Kristi Adachi, the respective supporting documents, and the record. Under the circumstances of this case, the family court's issuance of the February 12, 2014 "Order Directing Seizure of Any and All Computers and Data Storage Devices in Plaintiff s Possession or Control" ex parte and outside any formal discovery request was a flagrant and manifest abuse of discretion, and, accordingly, a writ of prohibition is warranted. See Honolulu Adv., Inc. v. Takao, 59 Haw. 237, 241, 580 P.2d 58, 62 (1978) (a writ of prohibition "is an extraordinary remedy ... to restrain a judge of an inferior court from acting beyond or in excess of his jurisdiction"). Therefore,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition is granted. Respondent is directed to promptly deliver to Petitioner, through respective counsel, the computer and data storage devices removed from Petitioner's possession and specifically identified on pages 2-3 of Exhibit "3" attached to the petition. The family court may take appropriate steps to preserve and protect the property and information. This ...