Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Gracia v. Office of Disciplinary Counsel

Supreme Court of Hawaii

December 30, 2014

CLAUDETTE DE GRACIA, Petitioner,
v.
OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL and CRAIG FURUSHO, Respondents.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.

ORDER DENYING THE PETITION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS

Upon consideration of the record, we conclude the decision of Respondent Office of Disciplinary Counsel (ODC) to decline to further investigate Petitioner's allegations against Respondent Furusho is within the discretion of ODC and nothing in the record indicates an abuse of that discretion warranting a writ of mandamus. See Breiner v. Sunderland, 112 Hawai'i 60, 64- 65, 143 P.3d 1262, 1266-67 (2006); In re Disciplinary Board ofthe Hawai'i Supreme Court, 91 Hawai'i 363, 368, 984 P.2d 688, 693 (1999). We further conclude with regard to Respondent Furusho that, while this court has jurisdiction over him pursuant to its powers to manage and regulate the bar, this court has delegated powers to ODC and the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of the State of Hawai'i to investigate alleged misconduct, and nothing in the record indicates an abuse of that discretion. SeeIn re Disciplinary Bd., 91 Hawai'i at 368, 984 P.2d at 693. Finally, we note Petitioner has alternate ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.