Buy This Entire Record For
Hawai Electricians Annuity Fund v. Force Elec., Inc.
United States District Court, D. Hawaii
January 27, 2015
HAWAII ELECTRICIANS ANNUITY FUND, by its Trustees, Ronald Yee, Robert Hanamoto, Jody Hanamoto, Tracy Hayashi, Damien T. K. Kim, Peter Akamu; HAWAII ELECTRICIANS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND, by its Trustees, Ronald Yee, Jody Hanamoto, Rodney Chun, Tracy Hayashi, Peter Akamu, Damien T. K. Kim; HAWAII ELECTRICIANS PENSION FUND, by its Trustees, Ronald Yee, James Yamada, Jr., Jody Hanamoto, Tracy Hayashi, Peter Akamu, Damien T. K. Kim; HAWAII ELECTRICIANS TRAINING FUND, by its Trustees, Daryl Suehiro, Stephen Duarte, Phillip Lucero, Peter Akamu, Damien T. K. Kim, Tracy Hayashi; HAWAII ELECTRICIANS SUPPLEMENTARY UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS FUND, by its Trustees, Robert Hanamoto, Jody Hanamoto, Steve Watanabe, Peter Akamu, Damien T. K. Kim, Dennis Kaloi; HAWAII ELECTRICIANS VACATION AND HOLIDAY FUND, by its Trustees, Robert Hanamoto, Jody Hanamoto, Steve Watanabe, Damien T. K. Kim, Peter Akamu, Tracy Hayashi; HAWAII ELECTRICIANS PREPAID LEGAL FUND, by its Trustees, Jody Hanamoto, Steven Tanaka, Rodney Chun, Tracy Hayashi, Dennis Kaloi, Damien T. K. Kim; HAWAII ELECTRICIANS MARKET ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM FUND, by its Trustees, Daryl Suehiro, Stephen Duarte, Robert Hanamoto, Damien T. K. Kim, Robert Aquino, Brian Lee, Plaintiffs,
FORCE ELECTRIC INC., a Hawaii corporation; GLENN Y. GUSHI, individually; JOHN DOES 1-10; JANE DOES 1-10; DOE CORPORATIONS 1-10; DOE PARTNERSHIPS 1-10; DOE GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES 1-10, DOE TRUSTS 1-10, Defendants
For HAWAII ELECTRICIANS TRUST FUNDS, Plaintiffs: JARED N. KAWASHIMA, CHRISTIN D. WEHRSIG, KAWASHIMA LAW GROUP LLLC, Honolulu, Hawaii.
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION TO GRANT IN PART AND DENY IN PART PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT AGAINST DEFENDANTS FORCE ELECTRIC, INC. AND GLENN Y. GUSHI
Barry M. Kurren, United States Magistrate Judge.
Before the Court is Plaintiffs TRUSTEES of the HAWAII ELECTRICIANS ANNUITY FUND; HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND; PENSION FUND; TRAINING FUND; SUPPLEMENTARY UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS FUND; VACATION AND HOLIDAY FUND; PREPAID LEGAL FUND; MARKET ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM FUND's (hereinafter collectively referred to as " Plaintiffs") Motion for Default Judgment as to Force Electric, Inc., and Glenn Y. Gushi. (Doc. 12.) Plaintiffs request that default judgment be entered pursuant to Rule 55(b)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure in the amount of $228, 831.90, for contributions to Trust Funds, Liquidated Damages, and attorneys' fees and costs. (Doc. 12 at 9-10.)
This matter came on for hearing on January 12, 2015. (Doc. 15.) Appearing on behalf of Plaintiffs was Christin D. Wehrsig. Defendants Force Electric, Inc., and Glenn Y. Gushi did not make an appearance or otherwise defend against Plaintiff's Motion. (See id.) After careful consideration of the Motion, the declarations, exhibits, and the record established in this action, the Court finds and recommends that Plaintiff's Motion be GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. As discussed more thoroughly below, this Court recommends that judgment be entered in favor of Plaintiffs in the amount of $207, 091.07.
On August 26, 2014, Plaintiffs filed a Complaint seeking judgment for outstanding trust fund contributions and damages against Defendants FORCE ELECTRIC, INC., AND GLENN Y. GUSHI (collectively referred to as " Defendants"), alleging that Defendant Force Electric, Inc. (" Defendant Force Electric") materially breached the collective bargaining agreements referred to as the Inside Agreement and Outside Agreement dated February 16, 2012 (collectively, the " Bargaining Agreements"). Plaintiffs claimed that Defendant Force Electric failed to submit monthly contribution reports and full payments due on said report pursuant to the terms of the Agreements, all notwithstanding demand by Plaintiffs.
Plaintiffs allege Defendant Glenn Y. Gushi (" Defendant Gushi") should be held liable for all judgments entered against Defendant Force Electric because he was a member or officer of Defendant Force Electric and the alter ego and/or mere instrumentality of Defendant Force Electric. Additionally, Plaintiffs assert a claim for breach of fiduciary duty against Defendant Gushi, alleging that he is a fiduciary under ERISA because he exercised authority or control respecting management or disposition of plan assets. Plaintiffs allege that Defendant Gushi breached his fiduciary duties by intentionally failing to report and/or pay the required contributions. Plaintiffs ask for a monetary award against Defendants and the imposition of a constructive trust on the assets of Defendants.
The action arises under the Labor-Management Relations Act, 1947, as amended, the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, and the Multiemployer Pension Plan Amendments Act of 1980. Jurisdiction is founded on questions arising thereunder and more specifically under 29 U.S.C. § § 1145 and 1132(a) and (f).
Service of process of the Complaint was made on Defendant Force Electric on September 8, 2014, as evidenced by the Proof of Service filed herein on September 10, 2014.
Service of process of the Complaint was made on Defendant Gushi on September 8, 2014, as evidenced by the Proof of Service filed herein on September 10, 2014.
On October 24, 2014, default was entered against Defendants due to said Defendants' failure to answer or otherwise defend on the Complaint.
On November 26, 2014, Plaintiffs filed a Motion for Entry of Default Judgment (" Motion") seeking an award of the sum of $228, 831.90, which includes contribution amounts of $204, 924.41, liquidated damages of $21, 740.83, legal fees of $1, 488.50, costs of $605.97, and general excise tax of $72.19.
Plaintiffs' Motion for Entry of Default Judgment was accompanied by the Declaration of Travis Umemoto in support of the damages sought by Plaintiffs. The Declaration of Jared N. Kawashima also accompanied the Motion for Entry of Default Judgment in support of the attorneys' fees and costs requested.
Defendant Force Electric was served with a copy of the Motion but did not file an opposition or otherwise respond to the Motion. Defendant Gushi was also served with a copy of the Motion but did not file an opposition or otherwise respond to the Motion. The Motion was heard on January 12, 2015 with appearances by ...