Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

North Beach West Maui Benefit Fund v. Land Court of State

Supreme Court of Hawaii

February 2, 2015

NORTH BEACH WEST MAUI BENEFIT FUND, a Hawai'i non-profit corporation, Petitioner,
v.
LAND COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I, ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTOR OF THE COURTS, and CHIEF STAFF ATTORNEY OF THE SUPREME COURT, Respondents.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (1 L.D. CASE NO. 12-1-3039)

Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS

Upon consideration of Petitioner North Beach West Maui Benefit Fund's petition for a writ of mandamus or other relief, filed on December 1, 2014, the documents attached thereto and submitted in support thereof, and the record, it appears that Petitioner fails to demonstrate that it has a clear and indisputable right to the requested relief or that it lacks alternative means to seek relief. Petitioner, therefore, is not entitled to the requested writ of mandamus. See Kema v. Gaddis, 91 Hawai'i 200, 204, 982 P.2d 334, 338 (1999) (a writ of mandamus is an extraordinary remedy that will not issue unless the petitioner demonstrates a clear and indisputable right to relief and a lack of alternative means to redress adequately the alleged wrong or obtain the requested action); Honolulu Advertiser, Inc. v. Takao, 59 Haw. 237, 241, 580 P.2d 58, 62 (1978) (a writ of mandamus is not intended to supersede the legal discretionary authority of the trial courts, ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.